G24 Limited, Represented by Moorside Legal Services Ltd, Faces Cost Implications in Struck-Out Claim.

In the recent case at the County Court at Peterborough, G24 Limited (the Claimant) was represented by Moorside Legal Service Ltd. The Defendant, our former client made an application seeking to strike out the Claimant's reissued claim, which had already been litigated and resolved in favour of the Defendant.

The Defendant's legal team, represented by Mr Jackson Yamba of Lawrence and Associates Solicitors LLP, argued that the Claimant's actions constituted an abuse of process under the Res Judicate principle, as the claim had already litigated and dismissed. Additionally, the Particulars of Claim submitted by G24 Limited were found to be inadequate, failing to specify essential details such as the contractual terms, specifics of the alleged breach, and the losses incurred.

As a result of these arguments, the court struck out the Claimant's claim and ordered G24 Limited to pay costs amounting to £901.80 to the Defendant.