Parking Wars: How Contestor Legal Services Parked BW Legal and PPS in the 'No Win' Zone!" 🚗🅿️

In a riveting case at the County Court in Peterborough, Contestor Legal Services, with the unparalleled expertise of Mr. Jackson Yamba, masterfully defended a client against the unwarranted parking charges imposed by Premier Parking Solutions Limited (PPS).

Our client, the driver and registered keeper of the vehicle, had responsibly parked at Sunny Corner, Mevagissey, PL26 6ST. With utmost diligence, he purchased and displayed a valid parking ticket, strictly abiding by the car park's terms and conditions. Yet, in a twist of events, he received a £60 parking charge a few days post his PPS-managed parking experience. Unyielding in his conviction, our client appealed the charge. However, his appeals, both initial and to the IAS, were met with disappointing rejections.

BW Legal Services Limited (BW Legal) then entered the scene, tasked with launching proceedings against our client. Their claim, riddled with errors and in clear breach of CPR 16.4(1)(e) and Practice Direction 16.7.5, was a testament to their hasty approach. In search of justice, our client turned to us. With Contestor Legal Services by his side, he confidently filed his defence, standing tall as a litigant in person.

The final hearing unveiled BW Legal’s representative in a flustered state, seemingly unprepared and faltering. The court was evidently unimpressed by their weak pleadings and the subpar evidence they presented.

Enter Mr. Jackson Yamba, our client's representative, whose meticulous representation was nothing short of brilliant. He astutely highlighted the ambiguities in the contract terms, emphasising that with a valid ticket on display and zero evidence to the contrary, PPS's claim was groundless.

Mr. Yamba's prowess did not end there. He shed light on the discrepancies in the payment logs, revealing that multiple vehicles, including our client's, bore incorrect registrations. Adding to PPS's woes, they failed to prove the operational status of both payment machines, hinting at potential malfunctioning.

Channeling the landmark case of ParkingEye v Beavis, Mr. Yamba accentuated the court's duty in assessing parking ticket fairness. Given PPS's signage flaunting the BPA logo, they were unequivocally bound by the BPA Code of Practice. This mandated PPS to grant a £20 discount for registration blunders. With our client's registration being recognised yet incomplete, PPS's neglect in offering this discount was a blatant breach of the Consumer Rights Act 2015.

The court, swayed by Mr. Jackson Yamba's compelling arguments, delivered a verdict in our client's favor. PPS's claim was thrown out, and they were slapped with the costs.

This legal showdown underscored Contestor Legal Services' prowess and unmatched representation skills, spotlighting the significance of robust legal defence against ill-conceived claims.