Stopped is Not Parked": A Landmark Victory for Delivery Drivers

In a pivotal case that resonates with delivery personnel across the board—from Uber Eats and Amazon drivers to taxi operators—our client, Mr. Jozef Dymond, emerged victorious against UK Car Park Management Limited represented by Gladstones Solicitors. This case underscores a crucial distinction in traffic management and enforcement: the difference between stopping and parking.

Mr. Dymond, an Amazon delivery driver at the time, found himself at the centre of a legal battle over an alleged parking contravention in a car park managed by UK Car Park Management Limited. He was accused of parking on access roads/roadways when, in reality, his vehicle was merely stopped for about 8 minutes as he delivered a parcel.

Challenging the charge, Mr. Dymond argued that his brief stop to deliver parcels did not constitute parking. The case escalated to court, where he defended his actions on the same grounds. Represented by Mr. Jackson Yamba, acting as a Lay Representative, the defence presented a compelling argument. Mr. Yamba elucidated that parking implies leaving a vehicle for a duration exceeding the necessary time for activities such as boarding or alighting, loading or unloading, or briefly addressing an unforeseen issue like a flat tire. By this logic, a vehicle momentarily halted cannot be considered parked, as this would absurdly redefine traffic jams as lines of parked cars and render delivery services impractical.

The defence highlighted that the nature of stopping a vehicle—whether for unloading goods, assisting someone, or similar brief tasks—is a matter of context and should not be indiscriminately labelled as parking. This perspective left the Claimant struggling to justify their stance, despite the skilled advocacy on their behalf.

In a decisive moment, the court favoured Mr. Yamba's argument, rejecting the claim that Mr. Dymond's vehicle was parked during the 8-minute stop. This ruling not only marked a significant win for Mr. Dymond but also set a precedent beneficial to delivery drivers and service providers everywhere, affirming their right to perform their duties without undue penalisation.

This case exemplifies Contestor Legal Services' commitment to defending the rights of individuals and professionals in the face of unjust accusations. Our expertise and dedication to justice can make a significant difference in challenging legal situations. If you find yourself in a similar predicament or need legal assistance, reach out to us. Let our success in "Stopped is Not Parked" be the cornerstone of your defence.